|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Business Member
Last Login: 1/29/2009 1:10:29 PM
Posts: 165,
Visits: 3,202
|
|
While waiting for our EFIE we decided to hook up a vaporizer and disconnect the electrolizer just to see what results we would see... we filled up (same pump we always use stopping at first click) and then drove 42 miles... then we filled up again and the pump stopped on first click giving us 0.68 gallons... if our calculations are correct then this is about 61mpg ..... this is amazing ... and calls for more test drives.... we cant believe it  We also noticed that our car was not running as cool as it does when we have the Electrolizer. However that is 100% increase in mpg .... Will post again after we run some more tests.... we want to find out if the computer will kick in and such...... fun fun fun 
It's all good. Keep it simple, and never give up.
Everett, Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 3/5/2009 9:31:09 PM
Posts: 43,
Visits: 300
|
|
My take on this is that .68 gallon is way too small for a valid test. Get similar readings with a full or half tank test then you have something.
97 Chevy Astro with 244,000 miles Niceville Florida www.h2obay.com
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Business Member
Last Login: 1/29/2009 1:10:29 PM
Posts: 165,
Visits: 3,202
|
|
yeah I agree, we plan on doing this......also forgot to mention that we opened up the bubbler and were producing a lot of bubbling action. Our water went down about an inch.... will do longer tests on this... and post again regardless of the results... we are used to doing the 40 to 60 miles runs because after that our computer usually kicks in.... so that is why the test was done this way. We are looking first for immediate results. I also forgot to mention we tested it first without the vaporizer and our mpg was around 30 for the same distance. Needless to say... more testing shall be done....  Thanks 
It's all good. Keep it simple, and never give up.
Everett, Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 9/28/2008 10:33:29 PM
Posts: 18,
Visits: 88
|
|
| Hello... New to the forum and to water4gas. I saw you mentioned a Dodge Caravan. I have a 2002 Dodge Caravan with the same engine size. I was wondering how your mileage is doing on that vehicle?? Don
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Business Member
Last Login: 1/29/2009 1:10:29 PM
Posts: 165,
Visits: 3,202
|
|
We have not officially tested the mpg on this vehicle, because it has other issues... it was sitting for 6 months...smoking and what not... that all cleared up after adding the H.H.O..... we believe we were getting 14 mpg before H.H.O. and are now getting about 22 - 25 mpg ... however a bad tranny is preventing us from from further testing and so we do not want to make an official claim, we like to test again and again and again... and we have not been able to do that with this vehicle
Some advice for you if you plan on converting your dodge, go through the air filter only... and do not allow extra atmospheric air ..meaning close the air inlets(bubbler adjuster valve) on your jar... see how that works for you.... we find that starting out simple is the best way to go.... if you like the results then we suggest only doing soft adds...like wrapping o2 extenders... pvc enhancers work great as well... I do think your dodge will do very well.... ours loves the H.H.O. and the power increase is substantial
Best of luck,
West Edge
It's all good. Keep it simple, and never give up.
Everett, Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 9/28/2008 10:33:29 PM
Posts: 18,
Visits: 88
|
|
| WestEdge, Thanks for the reply on this issue. I just posted antoher response to your post in another thread. But this answers one of the questions I asked in that post. Thanks for the info on the Dodge. Don
|
|
|
|