|
|
|
Forum Guru
 
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| A friend told me to check this out in motor trend nov vol 60 no11 page 41 stanky clean. I was wondering if any one has tried using it. The article gos on to say that it produces a lot of H.H.O.. Manuel Varela
duh1 IL
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 10/30/2009 7:23:38 AM
Posts: 24,
Visits: 270
|
|
"As far as emission is concerned, the result of burning ammonia and hydrogen in an internal combustion engine is water vapor and trace amounts of nitrogen oxide"
This sounds good, I bet you would get more power from this engine.
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 11/18/2011 12:44:47 AM
Posts: 536,
Visits: 2,963
|
|
| Just another "little reason" for us to bring this technology to the whole world. About 100 static-sparked fires occur at gas stations each year, according to Fowler Associates, a Moore, S.C.-based electrostatic research and consulting firm. The fires most often result from easily avoidable mistakes committed by a driver while fueling. “I’ve worked on these tragic accidents, and have seen cars blow up from static at the gas pump,” says John Fagan, professor of electrical and computer engineering for the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Okla. Fagan says these fires start with the static electricity that all cars accumulate while driving as air passes over them. Static electricity is especially problematic when it’s cold and dry — 10 to 15 percent humidity or less — making winter the prime time for static fires. During fueling, fumes can leak from both the fuel tank and the pump nozzle. If you get in and out of the car several times, the car's static electricity can be transferred to your body. If enough static is built up, it can cause the vapors to ignite if you come too close to the fumes near the pump. “The fuel doesn’t ignite, but the vapor from the fuel,”
Walking Eagle, Last of the Visionaries
Bakersfield, CA
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Being
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 11/18/2011 12:44:47 AM
Posts: 536,
Visits: 2,963
|
|
Though we all know that "Global Warming" is more of a cyclic phenomenom, there is still cause to be concerned about the fuels, additives and materials used in the advance of "enviromentally friiendly" fuels. CO2 will be a major concern until we STOP cutting down rainforests around the world, at the rate of 5,000+ acres a day in Brazil alone!! I copied this out of the above link. The only problem faced with using ammonia as fuel is that in the production of this fuel, carbon dioxide is produced. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas which is responsible for the global warming phenomenon. The question I would ask is: How much CO2??? If you planted a tree for every 10 gallons of of ammonia you use, would that take care of the CO2 "created"??  
Walking Eagle, Last of the Visionaries
Bakersfield, CA
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| Ok here we go on 10-21-08 truck was runing with no mods. it was a calm day there 46.7 miles 2.3 gal = 20.1 mpg back 46.3 miles 2.3 gal = 20.1 mpg 10-23-08 runing on vaper 3 jars half windsheld washer and distel water lots of bubles. wind from east hiting on right side there 46.1 miles 2.3 gal = 20.04 mpg wind from south hiting strait on back 46.2 miles 2.4 gal = 19.25 mpg 2004 silverado crewcab 5.3 liter 130.00
duh1 IL
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| sorry I forgot to mention that on 10-23-08 I went with one jar making H.H.O. with a mixture of three tsp of ly first in line and then jar two as a vaper with mix of half windsheld/distelded and one tsp of ammiano. 10-24-08 there wind from south wind hiting from back less bubles. 46.1 miles 2.1 gal = 21.9 mpg back wind from south west wind hiting from front and right side. 46.2 miles 2.4 gal = 19.25 mpg 10-25-08 there wind from west wind hiting on right side. 46.1 miles 2.2 gal = 20.95 mpg back wind from south wind hiting in front 46.1 miles 2.4 gal = 19.2 mpg
duh1 IL
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| I also started the venturi test my first was made of two oil funels that came of the H.H.O. hose and end up in middel of air tube the part where there is a six inch compartment and I ended up with 21.9 mpg for 46.1 miles two times. Number two was made of two liter bottels and I moved the H.H.O. hose to be where that compartment was so that the venturi was over it all these times was with no blockage. The final venturi is made of two plastice glass from the party sication at the hobby labby store. I started to use the venturi after 10-23-08
duh1 IL
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| I figured that you may want to know more about the 46 mile rout. First I head north for 14.3 miles thats a littel over half hilly and the rest is flat. Then turn east for 19.4 miles that is ten % hilly and the rest is nice and flat. Then turn east for 12.4 miles that is more or less flat with two s-curves and about .2 miles of city driving the rest is 55 speed. I then use the some way back home. Manuel Varela
duh1 IL
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Online Book Member
Last Login: 1/24/2012 11:23:44 PM
Posts: 53,
Visits: 450
|
|
| My air fliter box has two openings on 11-1-08 I closed of the top one and the lower one I fixed up a plastic house siding piece so that I could close and open it. 10-27-08 There wind form w-n hiting right side 47.3 miles 2.4 gal = 19.7 mpg Back wind form west hiting left side. 46.2 miles 2.4 gal = 19.2 mpg 10-28-08 the trip is 97 miles one way at 65 speed and 55 speed back not the same way total 194 miles did this two days in aroll. 197 miles 10.3 gal = 18.8 mpg 193 miles 10.0 gal = 19.3 mpg Manuel Varela
duh1 IL
|
|